Recent submissions

Comment · 7 years ago
I think there are two unethical aspects to this: Firstly, less money spent will harm the economy, and, secondly, if lots of people do it, the system will adjust to lower salaries until it is not feasible anymore, i.e. this cheatcode depends on most other people still working their entire lives and constantly spending lots of their incomes.
Comment · 7 years ago
Such intrinsic interest to that extent was sexually selected for, so we're doing it only because of that. That's all I'm saying.

Intrinsic motivation makes sense to learn about the world to some extent, but there was not much to learn for hunter-gatherers to survive.

Comment · 7 years ago
I'm not smug. I'm concerned about dysregulation due to ignorance of basic motivational drives.
Comment · 7 years ago
Long-term planning/deferred gratification. You were setting up a career as a source of status later in life.
Comment · 7 years ago
I think it's accurate. There is no doubt about it. I also don't see that there is anything is wrong with it. I think you have simply internalized modesty memes, but that ultimately makes you ignore fundamental motivations which in turn leads to dysregulation.
Comment · 7 years ago
You risk getting bad reputation if you don't care about your offspring and social environment. People care about their reputation to be socially included (because that enables access to sex, among other reward signals of course, but sex is the strongest).
Comment · 7 years ago
> Obviously, you're only saying that to get laid, so who can trust you?

That's correct, but why would that reduce trust?

Comment · 7 years ago
Either it's a flaw in the engineers (lack of social skills to admit a mistake accurately) or in the working climate (fear of unreasonable repercussion make the engineers defer disclosure of failure). I'm undecided. Eitherway it seemed surprisingly inefficient way of communicating.
Comment · 7 years ago
Quitting is embarassing, certainly often locally a downward slope on the status landscape.
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Most normal people decide at some point that math is not for them in order not to embarrass themselves by claiming competence in a domain in which they are not confident at all. And hence, compared to nerds or seriously talented individuals who can confidently claim this status, they never spend much time on math and eventually seriously lack skills even in simple logical reasoning. This is basically math anxiety. Nerds, on the other hand, are incentivized to gain social status via math skills as a potential escape of their low status. I think this mainly explains the author's observations that these two skills are not correlated very much, basically an introversion vs extroversion polarization based on social expectations and incentives. Math is also intimidating, so I'd imagine someone with some experience in it also develops overall higher inhibition and hence is a worse verbalizer.

There is a huge literature on the relation between logical reasoning and verbalizing, which the author sadly ignores.

Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Would someone be willing to provide a brief summary for those who cannot watch the video at the moment?
Comment · 7 years ago
What does your magit workflow look like?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton