Cameron_D

nginx-rtmp can take a source and forward to multiple outputs. Fairly more advanced is BBC's Brave which is more of an API-driven live video editor that can push to multiple outputs.

It's not a just CloudFlare outage, its a global CenturyLink/Level3 outage

It is, sounds like he was trying to port-forward for IPv4, but can't as his ISP uses a CGN or 464XLAT or something to provide IPv4 access - so port forwarding isn't an option.

All that needs to be done is add the appropriate firewall rules (probably on the router and computer) to allow traffic for that port and it'll be accessible from the outside over IPv6.

Cloudflare don't proxy mail though, which is ProtonMail's main business, so that wouldn't have done much for keeping their services up.

Additionally, I don't see ProtonMail as the kind of company that'll let other third parties terminate their SSL connections/proxy all their traffic.

However, looking at Twitters front page I see it establishing connections to 6 different domains, that's one TLS session for each one.

ArchiveTeam has been, first we were grabbing full pages and images and storing them, but wound up with IP bans (Not unexpected), so a couple of people went through and grabbed the first 500 million images directly from CloudFront, they're still sitting on that 55tb of data.

Following that TwitPic then removed all images from showing on their site and required signed requests to load images from CloudFront so the remaining 300m images can't be fetched yet.

Today TwitPic restored the images and such to their site so AT is stepping back, rewriting their scripts to properly grab pages/images/metadata and will start from the most recent image working backwards and properly store them/removing the earlier grabs as we replicate them.

In the end the data will probably reside in offline storage at the Internet Archive until something happens to the TwitPic site.

I've been asked last month to rebuild my church website. I'm going to show them this and get their feedback on utilising it, it looks amazing!

> Yes Steam I think tracks what websites you've been to, but they only do this when they are already suspecting you of cheating, and they only send a hash of the url to see if matches known cheat sites. That's just one of the things I remember.

And this is perfectly okay, but looking through a list of start menu entries isn't? In fact I'd consider shipping off lists of URLs and domains I've been to worse than looking through installed programs.

> In a perfect world EA would just use steam and give up on Origin.

I disagree, competition is a good thing. By this same argument we should all ditch every other operating system because most users run Windows, so using others isn't necessary. Sure Origin has had its' share of bumps, but so did Steam in its early days, now look at it - Steam is adored by gamers and anything else is immediately shunned.

> would be less than they spend on their own anti-cheat

I'm not sure about this, but from my understanding Steam doesn't really offer much anti-cheat, mostly just DRM. Valve games all have VAC, but I'm not sure how widely used VAC is for non-Valve games.

> It would definitely be worth it to the user as the Origin software is horrible.

I partly disagree with this. The Origin interface really isn't that bad, I actually find it a lot faster/more responsive than Steam's. Steam's interface is also far from great - although they do have great cross-platform consistency, it is at the expense of being inconsistent with the users operating system.

Right, so Google end up with the IP address of the NAT gateway that my mobile provider puts me through. Hundreds, if not thousands, of other people will be sharing the same gateway.

In addition, DNS doesn't send my GPS co-ordinates along with the request, so it will just be IP geolocation data which Google will collate for their own stats on their DNS servers (So they can see/log what regions people access from, etc.).

Just because it mentions storing location doesn't mean they are trying to monitor every step you take when using their DNS.

Mine was banned a month ago with around $300 in the account, I haven't tried to get it back due to how difficult they make it to understand why you were banned - how am I supposed to fix what they don't tell me is broken? Such a shame there aren't really any other good ad CPM providers for small or medium sites.