C6JEsQeQa5fCjE

Given the context of the thread, what you have done here fits so perfectly.

> Does getting there 6 months sooner actually mean anything in terms of say, the 5, 20, 50, 100 year view?

You then use the power of AGI to keep everyone else down, economically and militarily. Billions of AGI-controlled drones patrolling the Earth and enforcing your supremacy. Yes, the future is grim and dystopian.

If one thinks this is farfetched, they aren't paying attention to geopolitics.

> HN sometimes poses really difficult questions.

The person who posted that question is Israeli.

If that's true, then great! Then we can do mass ancestry tests to establish the subpopulation that is indigenous to the region of historic Palestine. Let's do it.

Yes, for the sole reason that it's just a label assigned by an invading enemy government.

The problem is that the label is used in media to assign moral judgement, when it's just a political proscription that is typically assigned for entirely geopolitical reasons. Almost every country occupying a foreign territory, or is engaged in war with a group, or even another country, calls military action of the other side terrorism.

It doesn't mean anything. If it is to carry a moral judgement, it needs to be based on universally applied principles. It takes 5 seconds of thinking to see that it's absolutely not based on universally applied principles.

Let's confirm your claim through DNA tests to establish ancestry of Israelis and Palestinians.

Oh, they're banned in Israel?! Why would they possibly be banned?? Could it be that...

Actions, not words. Otherwise we'd be believing that a certain political party in the 40s Germany was simply all about work setting you free.

Zionists have showed what they are about through their actions ever since establishing their ethnosupremacist state. And they showed that genocide is not a red line to them over the past 2 and a half years. What they say they are about on paper is no longer relevant.

> when will we put somebody in congress with a CS background who can literally just chime in and say "use Zero Knowledge Proofs for this, people might actually buy that you're not just building a surveillance state."

Well that would be counter-productive to actually building a surveillance state.

> Politicians will do any draconian measure to help kids except [...]

They are covering for and not prosecuting perpetrators in the biggest child trafficking and abuse scandal in recent memory -- the Epstein case. Let us do away with even a surface-level pretense that they care about kids at all.

1) In Germany, a man was arrested recently over a suspicion of belonging to Hamas and planning attacks. A suspicion. Belonging to Hamas.

2) Alleged by the authorities to have been done by Hezbollah.

3) Not Europe.

4) Not Europe, and it's been merely alleged by PM Albanese that the incident had anything to do with Iran.

> I can add more if that’s not “terroristy” enough for you.

Please do, as the ones above are really not meeting the bar.

> Iran funding terrorism across Europe

Provide strong evidence or retract your statement.

> Without Israel, all Western civilisation is toast

Before Israel was established in 1948, was Western civilization toast? Or was it the power of the "western civilization" that conquered and ruled the world for centuries beforehand that allowed the creation of Israel?

More playing to vibes. For the passive reader, given that no evidence whatsoever was provided (let alone of the extraordinary kind) despite having been given ample opportunity to do so, please consider the extraordinary claims to be effectively retracted.

Have a good night.