ButlerianJihad

Historically, P2P networks have needed enforcement of share-and-share-alike if they wanted people to contribute as much as they downloaded. There are plenty of derogatory names for people who only download and never contribute.

But obviously, this is the reality of a consumer Internet. We all want to download and install software, and we want to consume media, watch Netflix/YouTube, and generally read web pages rather than write them, or produce videos or upload massive amounts of content. It's typically been beyond our resources, as consumers, to produce any appreciable amount of uploads that are worth contributing.

However, and this chills me to the bone to think about it, but now AIs have democratized the production of content, and so anyone who can afford a few tokens can absolutely generate mounds of spam, whether it's walls-of-text or fake music or hours of video content that they didn't need to write, produce, or edit. Hollywood can produce mass amounts of crap every year, but salaries are still paid and audiences still pay, in order to say how much they hated every minute.

So if you think about it, the commercial consumer Internet may be at a precipice where, all of a sudden, everyone begins contributing beyond their means, and it's all slop that needs to be gated and throttled and rate-limited. Furthermore, it won't be monetizable or copyrightable; people will just fill up social media storage with streams of consciousness where nobody cares. Nobody would miss it if it were deleted or shadowbanned.

The DOCSIS is a good start; I mean I'm behind 100Mbps/12Mbps nominally, so I should only be able to contribute 1/10th of what I'm consuming, currently. But do we really want a truly P2P Internet, where everyone is just shoveling slop at everyone else? Really?

> there's essentially zero UV light

Okay look, we are still talking about a symptom and not a disorder. Clearly, the subject of TFA is an aberration, being a football player, ostensibly active and exercising and being outdoors on the regular.

But most people diagnosed with deficiency are not doing any of that.

It really doesn't matter if they're making Vitamin D or whether they're being exposed to UV at all. You could be working in a post in Antarctica, and either you're at a desk job where you're sitting all day and not exercising, or you're working in a storeroom and running around outside doing highly physically demanding things and getting proper exercise. The doctor is clearly going to be concerned about the former person, but what are the indicators?

The people with low Vitamin D need to be retested and monitored during bright summer months to see if the deficiency persists. They need to be up-front about their activities and whether they're exercising properly and getting fresh air at all. The point is not the D nor the UV at all, but the D is what the physicians can detect, and the D is what they will prescribe when it goes off the rails, but what people actually, really need is not prescribable, and it doesn't profit anyone anything, and that's the crux of the problem.

Yes, you can track dosage that way, but squirting it into a beverage and then drinking the beverage is a good way to get off-track. What if you are in the habit of not finishing the entire beverage? Or some reaction or poor mixing occurs? It seems if the directions for a liquid medicine say to squirt it into your mouth, then you squirt it directly into your mouth.

But the trouble with supplementing Vitamin D is that you are treating a symptom. A Vitamin D deficiency usually indicates that you need to touch grass, get outdoors, do some exercise. Since the physician and clinic profit by $0 when they recommend those things, they prescribe you a pill instead. Which idea is a better solution?

It is the subtitle of a #3 synth-pop hit by Information Society, which debuted only 16 months before the release of the unrelated Belgian techno anthem, "Pump Up the Jam".

This is a transcript of a 60-minute podcast. Would you like that TIFF in Zmodem format? Or they could read it out in base64?

Since YC is an incubator, they undoubtedly rank Star Search as first place of the Big Three franchises. We shall see how Hacker News reacts when Arsenio or Martha Quinn shuffles off this mortal coil.