BodyCulture
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
You certainly know that it happened not by accident that traditional computers are producing reliable results, a lot of work went into this.
Computers must produce reliable results, they are simply not useful if not.
People will understand that at some point, but a lot of damage already has been done.
How do you decide what is exceptional when you have only silence to compare to?
That means are they trustworthy, or simply said true.
There is a science behind getting computers to produce reliable and correct results.
Current AI products still do not conform to that goal and therefore are not usable.
Instead of making this tech usable behind closed doors, they are selling unfinished products that produce errors and people are already dying from it!
It seems to be of more importance to test the product presented on this issue instead of drawing pictures.
Please use your professional skills for something useful, thank you very much!
This type of product would not have been published in a world where we assumed that computers must produce reliably correct results.
A) How to prevent malicious injection of bad training data?
B) How to handle copyright violations, will participants be responsible and will they have to pay the creators?
C) Can this create an income stream for content creators and how to avoid abuse, eg feeding with AI content?
So many more, but let’s focus on these before we break things fast because we didn’t think about them.
Yes, of course there are still users out there that execute all software under the same account.
Inability to use the tools at hand to protect your data is not a technical issue.
You can do both, achieve a cool retro style and publish in a more modern format that supports multiple output devices.