Bimos

Unless the existence of the reason is also proved.

Maybe the open problems are just by nature non-elegant and we human beings are bad at non-elegant mathmatics and found them either hard or not interesting before.

It is interesting how "hyper-text" is considered plain nowadays

I was hoping that it was "404 not found"

I thought a flag is 1 bit

As a Chinese, I would say most public toilet I came across are cleaner then the toliet in my home... Before 2015, I was young, a bit shy and hated dirty toilets so I rarely go to toilet outside. (Also at that time I lived with my father and he kept our toilet really clean. <3) When I was like 8 years old (at 2000s) or younger, I once pee in my pants at school because I really didn't want to go to the toilet in the school... I think that is the last time I pee-ed myself.

So I would say it did work.

But TBO I moved to Shanghai after university which is generally richer than my hometown so I'm not sure about the condition in my hometown nowadays.

> Red means Rear, and white means front

And yellow means sides then? Make sense to me.

Never see this in China and didn't know it exists before.

*Practice talking like Claude so that I can eventually let Claude reply my messages and no one feel strange

Chinese native speaker here. On Zhihu (known as Chinese Quora), I feel like every piece of answers are AI-generated nowadays. Although before LLM time, maybe 90% of content there are also meaningless. There must be some false positives, but I'm just becoming uncomfortable with those AI-like tones like "not.. but.." or something. I'm getting persecutory delusion on it.

To me it doesn't seem wrong to call covectors "row vectors", but one shouldn't simply convert them to each other with no good reason.

I found it really insightful (and always overlooked) to distinguish between vector and co-vector spaces. It doesn't necessarily produce new knowledge, but makes things more clear.

You don't place the bombs, but still find the bombs. And you still explore by finding x.

I'm super confused. In your example, ++i is equivalent to (i+1) and the loop updates i itself. But with the syntax in the blogpost, i is only initialized, and it is the ++i that updates the value?