BeFlatXIII

Treating children and teenagers as the same group is out of control.

How soon until someone earns a PhD for studying the harms of goatse?

Some students enjoy learning for its own reward.

Depends on your goal. If you can get a higher GPA by cheating and don’t plan on using the actual knowledge…

The terrorists keep winning each day the 4th Amendment is not restored.

Finally, specific criticisms that aren’t “it’s not Photoshop!”

> For every one of us, there are hundreds, thousands of developers who literally do not give a shit so long as their paychecks hit their accounts

May our new AI co-workers put those thousands into the poorhouse for shoddy worksmanship.

So the rest of the world should have the access removed out of some delusion of fairness?

On the other hand, if it's a one-off, you'll have forgotten what you learned by the time you'd need to use that skill again.

Keeping outdated models in the curriculum needs to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Some of them are detrimental to the learning process and should be relegated to a history of science class—skip directly to current understanding; others are useful because they're developmentally appropriate for younger students. Someone who has a background in science pedagogy would be the proper person to make that decision for the Bohr model.

That's also why they're the ones who are most vehemently opposed AI art. The algorithm only cares for content, not the artistry they add to their images.

Yes! I want my AI music generator to spit out stems and sheet music I can rearrange, not finished mp3 files.

…and the sting is that the majority of people employed in creative fields are hired to produce content, not art. AI makes this blatantly clear with no fallbacks to ease the mind.

[ citation needed ]