BSVogler

I think this blog gets some special treatment on HN.

I am in the same situation where people are hosting copies of the software for commercial use in companies. Even as big as Tencent. That is not allowed with my license and they also went to remove the code that does the license check on application startup. GitHub’s response so far: “please give an explanation how they can become conformant so that the users can fix this.”

I tested your model quickly and it seems that the model does not do what is claimed here (that it can do the same as jev). It relies on an LLM, while jev does not need an LLM. While it is interesting and novel work it is not a replacement for expensive LLM calls.

For anyone interested in playing around with it, it requires python 3.11, else it will segfault.

According to the code the conversation turn index is a signal that enters so it is judging on something that does not transfer to other tasks. In the sampling it moved the score more than the actual content.

it does not have to be patching over the existing system. Of course you need someone experience in the loop, but it is not that someone needs to manually refactor everything by typing every line. One approach that works quite well is like this.

"give me all the specs in a list" -> "which architectural changes would simplify the implementation based of these specs" -> delete everything -> "implement the new specs"

This is cope. There is no going back to artisan programming. Any issues will also be fixed by ai agents.

I once read that noise of camera in total darkness is apparently a good source.

The federation in Germany is one lesson from the Nazis. Centralised power makes it easier for fascism or totalitarian governments to emerge. Recent example is the US with the instrument of executive orders. So it is deliberately designed to keep Germany small.

Only fascist have an issue with antifascists.

What would be strange are hackers that are fascist. Fascism demands surrender to power and obedience, which is antithetical to the hacker sprit. Questioning systems, equalizing power imbalances is the hacker spirit.

First look shows me that this is not an easy drop in replacement. First thing is this requires a log-in and makes me wonder why this is required. Perhaps some upselling coming.

With Bitnami discontinuing their offer, we recently switched to other providers. For some we are using a helm chart and this new offer provides some helm charts but for some software just the image. I would be interested to give this a try but e.g. the python image only various '(dev)' images while the guide mentions the non-dev images. So this requires some planning.

EDIT: Digging deeper, I notice it requires a PAT and a PAT is bound to a personal account. I guess you need the enterprise offering for organisation support. I am not going to waste my time to contact them for an enterprise offer for a small start-up. What is the use case for CVE hardened images that you cannot properly run in an CICD and only on your dev machine? Are there companies that need to follow compliance rules or need this security guarantee but don't have CICD in place?

With the difference that with docker you are shipping the runtime to your source code as well.

On Safari it is just a black screen.

Gameplay wise this is super basic and has been done endless times before. It looks like a "hello world" of games, so maybe focus on bringing either quality or novelty.

It does not even have to be successful. After getting repeated feedback about my strengths as an entrepreneur and how it is not a good fit for that position, I am now toning that down a lot. YC advertises that funding a company is always good career choice because even if you fail it will be good in your CV. But my experience so far is that many companies see it as a red flag.

No, it is just one option you can select.