BLO716
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
Unfortunately, the lasting affect will be a net positive, because sometimes you have to just be the adult and say loosing money isn't an option. I would like to call this shedding the college weight, and firing 80% of the work force, because the business will die otherwise in the case of Twitter.
Would you rather run a business with much higher ROI with a small user base and run a lean business, or a fat business with super scale data but bleeding out money? I'm not sure I get the argument against this.
What's the problem here?
The cooperative group think can be ... absolutely terrible, and having someone who is delivery to this level of scrutiny in a check-list style is probably the best I've seen in a long time.
That's the traditional hierarchy from an educational perspective on one end to the other, as far as I visualize it.
Everything has to start in the brain and be cognitively teased out to become the [math] part. The traditional scientific method then realizes it within the scope of the math foundation, that then in my world gets manifested into a software realization that can do mechanical things, and then it drives the physics and rubber-meets-road physical texture of it all. The realization of science always starts with a cognitive idea and general philosophy of one's ability.
As Sheldon would say, "I have a general working knowledge of everything in the Universe."
Little more complicated than Unions I think, that lead to the point we were at.
The shared resource thing, is just Netflix turning a blind eye, because their business model worked for a time and allowed this to happen. Now that DVDs are all but dead, this was the next logical business revenue model that needed a revamp.
How can anyone blame Netflix for FIXING a loss leader in their business line(s)? We all run and work for start-ups .. its the natural progression of finances at scale.