AzzyHN

Hehe, longs. I'd love to see this iterated on to keep adding new content that's in line with this kind of thing!

I'm not sure if the comment above you is correct, but if it is (meaning Signal would benefit from the anonymity of every client being the same/similar, like TOR), then this would go against that.

That being said, I've never heard this mentioned as a benefit of Signal, and I figured the main benefit was y'know robust and proven E2E encryption.

I knew something was up!

In California, around 9,000 a year according to the article

Ah yes, let's make our poorest citizens even more poor. Means testing doesn't work, read a book.

Okay, but most AI agents are so keen to get you an answer that they will give a bad one rather than saying "I'm not sure", which means giving links to malware or untrustworthy software.

"Given how the WH operates these days" I've got bad news for you...

It works on chromium-based browsers at least

[flagged]

And firefox stores them unencrypted by default

As a rule: don't bother with trying to "opt out" of data collection. Reject the collection entirely either by forcefully blocking it (ublock Origin for instance) or straight up not using the service.

If I try and run an unsigned program, the UAC window will be yellow, but I can run it with zero issue.

I cannot do the same thing on MacOS with the same ease, and that's the issue.

A bet against Nvidia is smart. A bet against Palantir is not. Palantir has become deeply integrated into the surveillance states of America, and won't be going anywhere anytime soon.

Where does "most moral" come from?

Trustworthy enough to shitpost behind? Sure.

Trustworthy to break some actual laws behind? Absolutely not.