Airsinner
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
A person may know how slow and different a legal decision is compared to what may be obvious and a reflection of reality, and therefore might arrive at a conclusion well before a system designed to be conclusive would.
The law is more about what can be proven than it is about what is true, and for people who know that, legal judgement stands separately from moral evaluation.
Once you venture into private parties evaluating other private parties, you encounter a collision of rights. It's still freedom of speech and association to not want to do business with certain people, and as long as those certain people aren't of a protected class, this falls well within the moral concepts of both free speech and presumption of innocence.
Those are all practical arguments, but the point I'm making is that advertising doesn't have to be this way; it's the implementation that's the problem, not the theory.
Practically, of course, it’s a different story.
The whole "servant leader" concept is good, even if it induces a gigantic eyeroll a lot of the time, and justifiably so.
The obvious problem here comes from when great ICs get promoted into these positions and have zero clue about any of this, but the best figure it out.