8note
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
thats close to tweaking existing dialog, but with a bit more freedom.
you still dont have to give the player arbitrary response
same with the df artworks. get kitfox to design some art styles for dwarves, elves, goblins, and humans, and then instead of just reading
"this is a fine engraving of a dwarf. it concerns the events of 102 when ulrist fastbuttons was elected mayor. ulrist fastbuttons is sobbing"
youre not really sure how to set up some of the logistics/how much of what you will need where ahead of time
that could be done directly by taxing IP licensing directly
the laundering wouldnt be all that hard to take those buttcoins on in exchange for clean ones.
the rule is ultimately "dont submit stuff where only your llm session knows whats going on"
if you brainstorm with an llm, then rewrite the llm prose but have no understanding, youve still broken the rule.
if you understand what it suggested, why, and so on, then you do know whats up, and thats unenforceable, but who cares
if you want to submit an LLM found bug, you could instead donate the tokens directly to the maintainers, rather than making them read your agent outputs
she ruined her campaign by trying to make it about hasan piker, who wasnt running, and a good portion of the people she needed as supporters kinda like piker on at least a surface check of what he has to say.
i think more what happened is all her donors were already out, and they just pointed at that poll. its not like it was a unique poll.
pointing at the fake poll gets her(and her consultants) some cover for having made bad campaign choices
i think this is more like putting out fake weather reports than fake corn harvest reports.
this still seems like the republican party trying to do some election fraud against themselves?
its the same for like a chess bot. i dont want a perfect stockfish that occasionally makes a serious blunder when a dice rolls a certain way. i want one that actually falls into traps