6031769

Those people do not sound very rational.

Bin it and start again but this time without AI.

If you are writing something that will be used that infrequently then I'd suggest (at least in a web dev context) that you are not "most people".

True. But they aren't as rioty.

You can criticise Apache for many things but lack of features is surely not one of them. It comes with the kitchen sink and has plenty of add-ons for all those extra cases you might want.

I'd also take issue with the "poor performance" slur. It's never going to beat out lighttpd for pure static speed but all the "poor" benchmarks I have see for it are entirely due to low quality (or no) configuration. Configure it properly and it flies.

> Caveman was cool, but hand wavy.

Cavey-wavy. Ahem.

It's a javascript animation library. I can only presume that this info was left out of the headline in order to generate clicks.

Consume it how, exactly? Are the staff drinking it all? Because the the kit sure as hell isn't. :-/

It may not inherently make it better (for some meanings of "better") but it certainly makes it more secure and more stable. Those are attributes which I would value very highly in coreutils.

And that point was when the public sector finally abandoned IE6. It has all been peachy since then.

So, if I can fake being under 18 then all these AI bots will now leave me be, right? This sounds like a winner.

"saying technically true things in ways to mislead large numbers of people" is pretty much the textbook definition of marketing in general. I'm not sure why one might expect the marketing for gaming generally or this game in particular to be any different.

Or a dried-fruit retailer.

IGMC.