533474

it reads fine to me

nice work

Great, an MIT license to accelerate planned obsolescence and hardware junk. Truly a brilliant move

The number of commenters who think UV light is the same as sunlight...

You should rename the project to OpenBox if you are not using a copyleft license. It is not libre.

You should have licensed it under AGPL; Anthropic then would have reached you to negotiate a commercial license or contribute back to the project, since AGPL forces server-side code disclosures when deployed. Without that, they can legally use, modify, and profit from it without sharing improvements or compensating you

Best advice here

Hostile royalty stipulation in the license, stay away

Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer...

boring...

I agree with your comment about high-skilled individuals but your other comment about 'ultra' low skilled migrants is also 'a sad state of affair'. Refugees want to work, just as any other law abiding citizen. If you have ever met a refugee or volunteered at a shelter you would realise how difficult it is for them to obtain working rights (some are highly skilled too btw). It seems like your simpleton 'highly skilled' mind likes to roam hn to spread opinions that could have added substance, if you left out your preconceptions about 'ultra' low skilled people...

What do you mean?

Do you have any example(s) of an advanced KiCAD board?

lol is that a bad joke? GPLv2 is better