405nm

@pen2l what are you even talking about…?

1) form studio can use any material out of the box you just have to design your own print settings for it

2) form studio wash + cure is $200, not $699

3) the new resins are UL certified for low voc/indoor use, as well as score as non-skin irritants (OECD 439), and post-processed parts comply with ISO 10993 for long term skin contact

4) the new resins cost $30-$50ish per L, as opposed to fdm ~$25ish per kg. you also have to buy a tank that eventually wears out but imo when i’m printing a lot with the same material the tank cost doesn’t add much to the overall

5) fdm is great too, i have both in my shop. you should always use the right process and material for the job. if you need higher detail than what fdm can provide, more sophisticated materials, and an order of magnitude higher volumetric print speed, the form studio is a great option.

source: i don’t work at formlabs, but i used to

been playing with for a few weeks, been having a great time with it

come join us on reticulum

“code correctness -> AI fluency”

you can’t think of a single thing that could be better about the hardware and software experience of phones?

not one?

it isn’t

that map on rmap.world is only showing nodes that run dicoverable=yes in their configurations or something like that.

based upon the announce stream coming through my local node, i am seeing around 14k unique identities advertising over 21k unique application endpoints (destinations) over the course of the past month or so that i’ve been tracking it.

i like it a lot, being agnostic to communication channel sets it apart from the lora only meshes. it’s cool to be able to use a mesh device to communicate with people who are both on and off the mainline internet seamlessly.

and there’s some cool stuff happening on nomadnet as well l

oh yeah and there’s a voice chat protocol that works over lora, too

it’s a bummer, but according to folks in the matrix chat, he’s still developing and in touch with some of the community devs.

meshtastic is chat and lora only. its protocol is super inefficient and unreliable, and only can handle a maximum of 7 hops across the mesh.

all users need to be running the reticulum network stack to be able to send, receive, and route packets.

reticulum itself describes the network stack (like tcp/ip) and it has its own protocols like LXMF for messaging and LXST for streaming. applications can be built on top of these protocols.

it’s different than IP, instead of addresses, each node has an identity that’s a cryptographic key pair that you send messages to, the routing happens in the background regardless of network topology or diversity of link types.

you CAN send reticulum packets over a TCP/IP adapter and thus across the normal Internet (there are a lot of testnet and community nodes that are accessed this way), but the protocol also seamlessly bridges over any interface (lora, bluetooth, HAM radio, etc) that is attached to the node.

so like, there could be a message sent over lora to a base station that relays it to another server through the internet, then that server sends it out over a ham radio link to another computer somewhere else, etc.

all the message sender has to know is the pubkey of the node they want to talk to, and the network figures out how to establish a link.

128 hops maximum.

the prerolled binaries of the aforementioned software include the network stack and easy enough presets to find content from other nodes and people to talk to.

check out reticulum and nomadnet, they meet these needs perfectly!