Comment

Comment by mbrock

Personally, I don't enjoy using web browsers much, either for "documents" or apps. There's a lot of good stuff out there made with hard work by talented people, but when it comes to my own personal computing, I would much rather use other kinds of interaction.

99% of my internet life consists of a few homogenous styles of interaction: browsing pseudo-hierarchical directories; communicating via text; purchasing; looking at pictures and movies; etc. In a hypothetical cyber-utopia or something, this could all just be a simple protocol (say, um, combining aspects of Direct Connect, BitTorrent, NNTP, Gopher, Bitcoin, GPG) that I could use with my own client, which would probably be an Emacs interface. Instead we live in a world where the web standards seem to encourage teams to spend their energy on reimplementing drop-down widgets.

It's wasteful and doesn't even lead to particularly good user interfaces. How many sites or web apps work well (actually well, not just semi-tolerably) with keyboard navigation? How much bandwidth and CPU goes to waste? How many sites work passably offline? How easy is it to automate tasks as a user? How easy is it to learn how to make your own sites?

I think "browsers" should be something very different from what they are today, and maybe something new will come along in the near future.

parent mbrock 11 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton