Comment Comment by buro9 Interesting link... some world cities compared (current Air Quality Index at time of writing before link):VERY UNHEALTHY298: http://aqicn.org/city/chicago/UNHEALTHY170: http://aqicn.org/city/usa/washington/seattle/beacon-hill/UNHEALTHY FOR SENSITIVE GROUPS122: http://aqicn.org/city/beijing/MODERATE96: http://aqicn.org/city/usa/oregon/portland/70: http://aqicn.org/city/tokyo/66: http://aqicn.org/city/berlin/65: http://aqicn.org/city/london/61: http://aqicn.org/city/hongkong/54: http://aqicn.org/city/newyork/GOOD33: http://aqicn.org/city/zurich/31: http://aqicn.org/city/stockholm/24: http://aqicn.org/city/paris/13: http://aqicn.org/city/california/san-francisco/san-francisco... parent buro9 11 years ago
VERY UNHEALTHY
298: http://aqicn.org/city/chicago/
UNHEALTHY
170: http://aqicn.org/city/usa/washington/seattle/beacon-hill/
UNHEALTHY FOR SENSITIVE GROUPS
122: http://aqicn.org/city/beijing/
MODERATE
96: http://aqicn.org/city/usa/oregon/portland/
70: http://aqicn.org/city/tokyo/
66: http://aqicn.org/city/berlin/
65: http://aqicn.org/city/london/
61: http://aqicn.org/city/hongkong/
54: http://aqicn.org/city/newyork/
GOOD
33: http://aqicn.org/city/zurich/
31: http://aqicn.org/city/stockholm/
24: http://aqicn.org/city/paris/
13: http://aqicn.org/city/california/san-francisco/san-francisco...