>> Not discussed in the article's introduction is whether Mr. Tanyolacar, and by extension The Economist, might possibly have any learning to do about how race works in America
If you look to the end of the article, it is clear that he had been insensitive at best.
>> The Economist has again chosen a revealing bedfellow
Your choice of language is antagonistic. It seems like you are implying the writer's and the publication's racist tendencies are slipping out. If so, I don't know what is the basis of that assertion.
If you look to the end of the article, it is clear that he had been insensitive at best.
>> The Economist has again chosen a revealing bedfellow
Your choice of language is antagonistic. It seems like you are implying the writer's and the publication's racist tendencies are slipping out. If so, I don't know what is the basis of that assertion.