Thanks. I'm from Europe, therefore really needing some explanations (to the opposite direction of the title subject of explaining European logic to the non-European readers):
> Overtime is a sign that something has gone terribly wrong
Why are there environments which don't think that the "overtime is a sign that something has gone terribly wrong?" How come that workers don't try to stand to their rights? Specifically:
> you're expected to work 50-60 hours a week
How come, if you sign the contract for e.g. 40 hours? The only thing workers are selling are their work hours, why do they accept to waste 25-50% of that?
> Overtime is a sign that something has gone terribly wrong
Why are there environments which don't think that the "overtime is a sign that something has gone terribly wrong?" How come that workers don't try to stand to their rights? Specifically:
> you're expected to work 50-60 hours a week
How come, if you sign the contract for e.g. 40 hours? The only thing workers are selling are their work hours, why do they accept to waste 25-50% of that?
At least Scott Adams gets it:
http://dilbert.com/strip/2011-12-19