I'm trying to figure out an interpretation of this that actually makes sense. He's suggesting people don't even consider their prior experiences when choosing restaurants now? The subjective experience of "free will" requires a high threshold of ignorance?
Maybe I'm overestimating other people but in those specific contexts, I almost never take the number of stars or a few people's reviews as the only relevant things to consider. (Or, maybe he's flattering himself by perceiving a type of non-agency in "the masses" that doesn't exist.)
Maybe I'm overestimating other people but in those specific contexts, I almost never take the number of stars or a few people's reviews as the only relevant things to consider. (Or, maybe he's flattering himself by perceiving a type of non-agency in "the masses" that doesn't exist.)