It's really hard to follow this. I realize they are trying to make it an explanation that normal (but interested) people can read. But it's not working.
Maybe an example up front would help. Something like: If this is enacted, then ... (some common use case involving fair use and how it would be impacted).
I know it takes a lawyer to read this stuff. But they should maybe pass it through a couple of layers of translation to try to communicate what it means, so that people can get on board with opposing it, if that's the right thing to do. If EFF can't communicate this stuff, who can?
It's really hard to follow this. I realize they are trying to make it an explanation that normal (but interested) people can read. But it's not working.
Maybe an example up front would help. Something like: If this is enacted, then ... (some common use case involving fair use and how it would be impacted).
I know it takes a lawyer to read this stuff. But they should maybe pass it through a couple of layers of translation to try to communicate what it means, so that people can get on board with opposing it, if that's the right thing to do. If EFF can't communicate this stuff, who can?