It doesn't attempt to engage with the arguments of Stuart Russell, Nick Bostrom, Eliezer Yudkowsky, and others who are worried, not about current methods, but about what will happen when the time comes -- in ten, fifty, or a hundred years -- that AI does exceed general human intelligence.
That's because it would be arguing a straw-man. So there is no reason to engage the argument.
That's because it would be arguing a straw-man. So there is no reason to engage the argument.