>I don’t see Go as something that is going to serve as a “better C”, so I’m waiting for something new.
This surprised me a bit. I think most people who tried Go would agree that it is, in fact, a better version of the C programming language. It follows many of the same UNIX-y principles and it's a pleasure to work with, mostly because the syntax just gets out of the way. I'd like to know more about his point of view if he's reading here :)
And while I'm at it, I want to thank Salvatore for giving us redis, which is also a pleasure to work with.
This surprised me a bit. I think most people who tried Go would agree that it is, in fact, a better version of the C programming language. It follows many of the same UNIX-y principles and it's a pleasure to work with, mostly because the syntax just gets out of the way. I'd like to know more about his point of view if he's reading here :)
And while I'm at it, I want to thank Salvatore for giving us redis, which is also a pleasure to work with.