>After all, Cepheus honed its strategy by playing the equivalent of a near-perfect opponent that made practically no mistakes.
So why don't you f king use that instead of making your own program?
Also, how do they know that play is optimal if poker hadn't been solved before? They're comparing it to perfect play, but if we can compute that, then the problem is done anyway.
So why don't you f king use that instead of making your own program?
Also, how do they know that play is optimal if poker hadn't been solved before? They're comparing it to perfect play, but if we can compute that, then the problem is done anyway.