This sounds absurd. This is the best analogy i've come up with:
A Sandwich shop sells half sandwiches at 5$ and full sandwiches at 6$
You, and a friend would both like half a sandwich. Instead of ordering two separate halves. You order only 1 full sandwich and cut it in half yourself.
Now the sandwich shop is suing you because you paid $6 for one sandwich, and only ate half of it. That's instead of paying 10$ for two half-sandwiches like the shop would like.
----------
I think if they don't want people to buy a product, then they shouldn't sell it.
Either lower the price of A -> B tickets, or make sure that tickets from A -> B -> C cost no less than A -> B
OR they could ignore this altogether and continue to sell A-B tickets at a premium realizing that people will only buy them for convenience.
A Sandwich shop sells half sandwiches at 5$ and full sandwiches at 6$
You, and a friend would both like half a sandwich. Instead of ordering two separate halves. You order only 1 full sandwich and cut it in half yourself.
Now the sandwich shop is suing you because you paid $6 for one sandwich, and only ate half of it. That's instead of paying 10$ for two half-sandwiches like the shop would like.
----------
I think if they don't want people to buy a product, then they shouldn't sell it.
Either lower the price of A -> B tickets, or make sure that tickets from A -> B -> C cost no less than A -> B
OR they could ignore this altogether and continue to sell A-B tickets at a premium realizing that people will only buy them for convenience.