I did. Twice. Sorry if you do not like people dissenting with your analogies but I don't owe you or anyone else here blind compliance with viewpoints. If I don't attack the argument and attack the speaker, well then we've got ourselves an ad hominem don't we? And what good is that?
I stated your analogy mischaracterizes an act of nature with willful and deliberate actions of people copying and redistributing content but agreed that markets need to evolve their distribution channels. I don't owe you anything more than that.
I stated your analogy mischaracterizes an act of nature with willful and deliberate actions of people copying and redistributing content but agreed that markets need to evolve their distribution channels. I don't owe you anything more than that.
Have a nice day.