What? The freak storm is supposed to represent the technological development of digital copying itself – I should know, I came up with the analogy. You stop mischaracterizing the analogy. It is an analogy, not a model.
Or are you implying that the developers of digital technology did so merely to copy cheaply those things which were previously hard and lossy to copy? (I doubt it.)
I.e. what is your actual criticism of my argument?
Or are you implying that the developers of digital technology did so merely to copy cheaply those things which were previously hard and lossy to copy? (I doubt it.)
I.e. what is your actual criticism of my argument?