> It is this piece of evidence—freely available to anyone with an enquiring mind and a modicum of cyber security experience—which I believe that the FBI is so cryptically referring to when they talk about “additional evidence” they can’t reveal without compromising “national security”.
The evidence mentioned here are the addresses of the Command and Control servers. But the author does not give any reason for why he or she thinks this is the thing the FBI is being cryptic about?
First of all, there might be several things to be cryptic about. Second, the article gives nothing that I can see to connect that bit of information to being something that FBI would hold back on. Third, the author just revealed it, so if it were what the FBI was keeping secret, that seems silly.
The evidence mentioned here are the addresses of the Command and Control servers. But the author does not give any reason for why he or she thinks this is the thing the FBI is being cryptic about?
First of all, there might be several things to be cryptic about. Second, the article gives nothing that I can see to connect that bit of information to being something that FBI would hold back on. Third, the author just revealed it, so if it were what the FBI was keeping secret, that seems silly.
Did I miss something?