No it isn't. "Both are strong object-oriented languages": the key word (that is wrong) is 'strong'. Based on my examples Python may implement OO better than say Perl but it is NOT a strong implementation of OO compared to other languages.
It's great to know how and why Python is the way it is, but at the end of the day you can give a million reasons, but the kettle will still be black.
What you posted is like me explaining that (current) Ruby is not slow (which is a joke), it just implements threading differently...
It's great to know how and why Python is the way it is, but at the end of the day you can give a million reasons, but the kettle will still be black.
What you posted is like me explaining that (current) Ruby is not slow (which is a joke), it just implements threading differently...