Not sure why you're downvoted. That's bad science regardless of how you look at it. The use of the word "climate" in a quote is a big indicator of bad science as it happens to pay the bills and make a good quote in the press before all other concerns at the moment.
If it turns up in a paper at the end and is peer reviewed, then it has some credence but before that, nada.
Feynman is rolling in his grave again...
Edit: if you downvote, explain yourself or you're a coward and a hypocrite.
If it turns up in a paper at the end and is peer reviewed, then it has some credence but before that, nada.
Feynman is rolling in his grave again...
Edit: if you downvote, explain yourself or you're a coward and a hypocrite.