Not again... I think this was already decided..
Can we just move on? I've switched to systemd on my laptop months ago and had not a single problem. Boot times are noticably faster.
Does Linux have to stay at software from the sixties forever? Can't we just move on to systemd and wayland and whatever fits better into the 21st century?!
I really feel this is all too political and FUD after months and months of senseless complaining about systemd and particularly far too personal regarding Lennart Poettering. If people like SysV init so much there will always be alternatives but this shouldn't hinder the majority of users to move forward with systems that just work with systemd (e.g. Debian+Linux). Nobody really uses Debian/kFreeBSD anyway, for example. Yet, it's a common statement that is brought up.
Does Linux have to stay at software from the sixties forever? Can't we just move on to systemd and wayland and whatever fits better into the 21st century?!
I really feel this is all too political and FUD after months and months of senseless complaining about systemd and particularly far too personal regarding Lennart Poettering. If people like SysV init so much there will always be alternatives but this shouldn't hinder the majority of users to move forward with systems that just work with systemd (e.g. Debian+Linux). Nobody really uses Debian/kFreeBSD anyway, for example. Yet, it's a common statement that is brought up.