From the article: "Its syntax [Bash] is insane, incredibly error prone, its defaults are awful, and it’s not a real big person programming language."
A "real big person programming language"? Wow, that guy's got some issues :D Seems like his definitions seems to be a functional programming language? I'd assume that there is way more "real world big importance" stuff written in Bash than there is in Haskell.
A "real big person programming language"? Wow, that guy's got some issues :D Seems like his definitions seems to be a functional programming language? I'd assume that there is way more "real world big importance" stuff written in Bash than there is in Haskell.