I don't quite get it. Normally, both the applicant and the employer take a risk when the latter decides to hire. You could argue that an employer takes the biggest risk.
In this system al the burden and risk is shifted solely on the applicant. So what does he or she gets in return? It's not clear from the article. I would expect that in order to attract applicants they must
- either be desperate,
- or have a salary offer in sight more than 2.5 times the market's average.
In this system al the burden and risk is shifted solely on the applicant. So what does he or she gets in return? It's not clear from the article. I would expect that in order to attract applicants they must
- either be desperate,
- or have a salary offer in sight more than 2.5 times the market's average.