Comment Comment by mattfenwick At no point did I touch on morality or ethics. I do not know why you think that I did so.> I agree with you that experimentation is futile in the absence of ethics.I do not agree with that.--------Dictionary.reference.com:> useful: being of use or service; serving some purpose; advantageous, helpful, or of good effect> good: having admirable, pleasing, superior, or positive qualities; not negative, bad or mediocreI urge you to reevaluate your understanding of the words "good" and "useful". Don't you understand that I'm not talking about morality? parent mattfenwick 12 years ago
> I agree with you that experimentation is futile in the absence of ethics.
I do not agree with that.
--------
Dictionary.reference.com:
> useful: being of use or service; serving some purpose; advantageous, helpful, or of good effect
> good: having admirable, pleasing, superior, or positive qualities; not negative, bad or mediocre
I urge you to reevaluate your understanding of the words "good" and "useful". Don't you understand that I'm not talking about morality?