A company which hold patents without implementing them is basically not following the spirit of the law.
Playing Devil's advocate, what about a company like ARM, which designs and patents new CPU designs and then licenses them to others? We can't claim their patents aren't implemented. Should they be forced to make the CPUs themselves?
And if not, what would prevent NPEs from licensing to one small company and then suing everyone else?
Playing Devil's advocate, what about a company like ARM, which designs and patents new CPU designs and then licenses them to others? We can't claim their patents aren't implemented. Should they be forced to make the CPUs themselves?
And if not, what would prevent NPEs from licensing to one small company and then suing everyone else?