> Additionally, both baremetal and OpenStack Ironic have a focus on 'triple-O', or OpenStack on OpenStack[2] use cases
Well, I'm sure they have issues but what gave you the impression they are focused on TripleO use cases?
As a TripleO dev I just use them.
Compared to more 'standalone' softwares like MAAS, these tools are integrated already into OpenStack, allowing you to deploy images on either virtual instances or baremetal without adding more software layers in charge of the images hosting, authentication, dhcp management and what not.
Well, I'm sure they have issues but what gave you the impression they are focused on TripleO use cases?
As a TripleO dev I just use them.
Compared to more 'standalone' softwares like MAAS, these tools are integrated already into OpenStack, allowing you to deploy images on either virtual instances or baremetal without adding more software layers in charge of the images hosting, authentication, dhcp management and what not.