> Therefore, if we are copying into s2 and we only leak data after the 4th character, we can assume that by default in the uninitialized stack there is a null at s23.
I'm very inexperienced with reverse-engineering, and haven't finished the article yet, but is "s23" here a typo? I can't find any other reference to it in the article, and it doesn't make sense to me. Should it be "s2"? Thanks
I'm very inexperienced with reverse-engineering, and haven't finished the article yet, but is "s23" here a typo? I can't find any other reference to it in the article, and it doesn't make sense to me. Should it be "s2"? Thanks