This absolutely isn't intended to be victim blaming in the slightest but my first thought when the story detailing his troubles in the Guardian came out a few days ago was: if you're going to start a service that challenges law enforcement and the intelligence services, you should really have a competent lawyer on retainer.
Thinking about it today, it occurs to me that in this day and age pretty much anybody with 410,000 users should probably have a competent lawyer who understands their business on retainer. What would be the exceptions to that?
Thinking about it today, it occurs to me that in this day and age pretty much anybody with 410,000 users should probably have a competent lawyer who understands their business on retainer. What would be the exceptions to that?