>> Maybe it was only patented to be able to defend against patent trolls.
It seems like this has been the standard rationale given by companies when they are awarded these kinds of patents. A few years later, we see lawsuits "defending" these ludicrous patents.
The system is certainly broken, but a broken lock does not justify a burglar's actions.
It seems like this has been the standard rationale given by companies when they are awarded these kinds of patents. A few years later, we see lawsuits "defending" these ludicrous patents.
The system is certainly broken, but a broken lock does not justify a burglar's actions.