> How many Nature papers are not reproducible? To call out a new bunch of people who are trying something different because people are afraid they’ll fail is sort of hypocritical given that we don’t really check whether anybody else’s results are correct, either.
Peer review is more about politics then reproducibility. Reproducibility is really important, but Nature doesn't seem to agree.
> How many Nature papers are not reproducible? To call out a new bunch of people who are trying something different because people are afraid they’ll fail is sort of hypocritical given that we don’t really check whether anybody else’s results are correct, either.
Peer review is more about politics then reproducibility. Reproducibility is really important, but Nature doesn't seem to agree.