> redo might be simpler and more reliable, but shell isn't.
Not quite sure what you mean here. The scripts don't do anything complicated and redo catches errors that could occur.
As for readability, etc, I suppose it's relative.
Simple makefiles do read very nicely. Unfortunately, they aren't always simple and hairy makefiles are just horrible to write, read and maintain. I've had no such problems with do scripts.
Not quite sure what you mean here. The scripts don't do anything complicated and redo catches errors that could occur.
As for readability, etc, I suppose it's relative. Simple makefiles do read very nicely. Unfortunately, they aren't always simple and hairy makefiles are just horrible to write, read and maintain. I've had no such problems with do scripts.