> You apparently don't understand how computers work.
You appears to like to jump to conclusions.
> There is no "meaning" associated with any variable or its value, and there cannot be.
Please give me a definition of "meaning" that can be applied to a human brain and not to a computer. And what is the evidence that it can not be applied to a computer?
You are also jumping to the conclusion that, if as you claim, the brain depends on something that can't be explained under the materialistic hypothesis, that a computer cannot, yet you have not even presented an argument for why that would be so.
You appears to like to jump to conclusions.
> There is no "meaning" associated with any variable or its value, and there cannot be.
Please give me a definition of "meaning" that can be applied to a human brain and not to a computer. And what is the evidence that it can not be applied to a computer?
You are also jumping to the conclusion that, if as you claim, the brain depends on something that can't be explained under the materialistic hypothesis, that a computer cannot, yet you have not even presented an argument for why that would be so.