To be fair, his style was highly argumentative. He left no room for subjectivity or talking about subjectivity in anything. Which leaves out a fair portion about what audio really is to the human brain, whether or not you perfect its reproduction mathematically.
His point of view, and his way of presenting it, were far too unbalanced and inhumane, regardless of their correctness. This was the reason he was not received well; not for the facts themselves.
This fact generalizes to a great many technical problems.
His point of view, and his way of presenting it, were far too unbalanced and inhumane, regardless of their correctness. This was the reason he was not received well; not for the facts themselves.
This fact generalizes to a great many technical problems.