I wonder if a more measured reaction rather than simply caving would have done them better.
They could have had their lawyers draw up a reasoned defense, then used that to wrangle a settlement offer whereby Watsi takes a large-ish donation in return for changing their logo.
Reason being a big battle would hit the larger plaintiff much harder in terms of public opinion. A little brinksmanship could do them a world of good.
Thoughts? Any legal eagles want to weigh in on whether this be a feasible course of action?
They could have had their lawyers draw up a reasoned defense, then used that to wrangle a settlement offer whereby Watsi takes a large-ish donation in return for changing their logo.
Reason being a big battle would hit the larger plaintiff much harder in terms of public opinion. A little brinksmanship could do them a world of good.
Thoughts? Any legal eagles want to weigh in on whether this be a feasible course of action?