> But in absence of this conflict, or the external meaning that is the cause of the (perceived) conflict, they wouldn't know what to do with their own existence
What nonsense.
> "Google" is nothing more than a tightly-bound collection of humans.
Yes, and collections of humans tend to exhibit emergent properties / behaviours which are not necessarily ideal in all respects.
Discussion of these properties / behaviours, and their desirability, is not a bad thing.
> They see the world in a black and white. "Us" and "them".
This is humorous to see in a post expounding a false dichotomy between the "two" types of people in the world.
What nonsense.
> "Google" is nothing more than a tightly-bound collection of humans.
Yes, and collections of humans tend to exhibit emergent properties / behaviours which are not necessarily ideal in all respects.
Discussion of these properties / behaviours, and their desirability, is not a bad thing.
> They see the world in a black and white. "Us" and "them".
This is humorous to see in a post expounding a false dichotomy between the "two" types of people in the world.