Huh? A physical law is defined as a "... [conclusion] based on repeated scientific experiments and observations over many years and which have become accepted universally within the scientific community."[1] In other words -- something that has been shown not to vary.
Faith by definition a "belief that is not based on proof".[2]
So you're arguing against the validity of formal logic or the scientific method or that a reached consensus cannot be trusted?
EDIT: I think you're overestimating the certainty that an empiricist would have about future events.
Faith by definition a "belief that is not based on proof".[2]
So you're arguing against the validity of formal logic or the scientific method or that a reached consensus cannot be trusted?
EDIT: I think you're overestimating the certainty that an empiricist would have about future events.
___
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_law
[2] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith