Comment Comment by methodover He makes an explicit case for both (1) and (2). He doesn't try and merely imply (2).Also, a transparent trade can still be exploitive. If I were to advertise for a slave, that would be an advertisement for an exploitive "offer."The real question is if this offer, in particular, is exploitive or not. I think he makes a solid case that it is. parent methodover 13 years ago
Also, a transparent trade can still be exploitive. If I were to advertise for a slave, that would be an advertisement for an exploitive "offer."
The real question is if this offer, in particular, is exploitive or not. I think he makes a solid case that it is.