We are indeed in the same space. Smarterer is great if you need a superficial, one-dimensional assessment of a handful of candidates.
MetaBright is better for detailed analytics on the abilities of many of your candidates. Here's a quick summary of what we see as the advantages of MB:
-- Parse out strengths and weaknesses of each candidate.
-- Questions that go beyond raw knowledge and test how well candidates can think (coding and writing exercises among others).
-- You can test your candidates on custom content that is specific to your organization.
-- Much deeper and denser skill assessments than anything you'll find on Smarterer.
-- Pricing plans that don't penalize you for giving your candidates multiple assessments.
-- Smoother test taking experience, with better cheating control.
MetaBright is better for detailed analytics on the abilities of many of your candidates. Here's a quick summary of what we see as the advantages of MB:
-- Parse out strengths and weaknesses of each candidate.
-- Questions that go beyond raw knowledge and test how well candidates can think (coding and writing exercises among others).
-- You can test your candidates on custom content that is specific to your organization.
-- Much deeper and denser skill assessments than anything you'll find on Smarterer.
-- Pricing plans that don't penalize you for giving your candidates multiple assessments.
-- Smoother test taking experience, with better cheating control.