There might not be a formalized 'grand plan,' but Dart doesn't have the open, cheerful intentions of CoffeeScript.
It's being designed as a javascript replacement. Google's overbearing intention is obvious.
You're right: Dart is, functionally, another CoffeeScript, but that's despite Google's plan--ok, 'experiment'--not by design.
>So, please, can we discuss this on its merits
Your criticisms are shared. That's what causes the friction: resentment that a pretty flawed language is being pushed. Dart does take time away from other more worthwhile projects.
None of the cynicism is over wishing that Google would stop experimenting with technology, it's over Google's waste of time.
Edit: Actually, apparently there might be a formalized 'grand plan,' reading nateabele.
It's being designed as a javascript replacement. Google's overbearing intention is obvious.
You're right: Dart is, functionally, another CoffeeScript, but that's despite Google's plan--ok, 'experiment'--not by design.
>So, please, can we discuss this on its merits
Your criticisms are shared. That's what causes the friction: resentment that a pretty flawed language is being pushed. Dart does take time away from other more worthwhile projects.
None of the cynicism is over wishing that Google would stop experimenting with technology, it's over Google's waste of time.
Edit: Actually, apparently there might be a formalized 'grand plan,' reading nateabele.