If they don't understand what's going on, wouldn't that argue in favor of doing more detailed research and analysis before writing claims? The original assumptions/claims in the Guardian story on PRISM are now shown to be false. This caused a lot of negative blowback on the companies involved.
Don't we expect our investigative journalists, to well, actually investigate things, instead of rushing to print?
Don't we expect our investigative journalists, to well, actually investigate things, instead of rushing to print?